Skip to content

Alan Redford Hayes

Ship RAG and agents that ops can trust.

When it works in the notebook but not in prod, I harden the path — with citations, evals, and failure modes operators can run.

Schematic of an agent loop: retrieve, reason, act, grounded by citations and evals.

Agent loop — retrieve, reason, act, with evidence.

What I build

Fixed-scope verticals so your team owns the system after hand-off — not another demo that dies in staging.

  • LLM apps

    Product surfaces with prompts, evals, and guardrails — which means you ship a feature operators can monitor, not a notebook demo.

  • Agents

    Tool-using workflows that plan, act, and recover — which means APIs get work done and humans still own risky escalations.

  • RAG

    Grounded answers with citations you can audit — which means support and ops stop guessing whether the model made it up.

Selected work

Anonymized engagements — real constraints and deliverables, no invented ROI or fake testimonials.

  • Internal knowledge RAG

    Constraint: cite sources on every answer · eval harness before launch

    Challenge
    A B2B support org’s scattered docs made answers slow and inconsistent across shifts.
    Approach
    Retrieval pipeline with chunking, indexing, and citation-aware answers over the existing ops wiki and runbooks.
    Outcome
    Operators get grounded Q&A with source links and an eval harness they re-run before each corpus update.
  • Support triage agent

    Constraint: human handoff required · no silent ticket closes

    Challenge
    A high-volume support desk burned hours on repetitive routing and knowledge lookups.
    Approach
    Tool-using agent wired to ticket APIs, knowledge base, and explicit escalation rules.
    Outcome
    The agent drafts triage notes with context preserved; risky closes always escalate to a human.
  • LLM product surface

    Constraint: regression evals in CI · observable failure modes

    Challenge
    A product team’s prototype prompts worked in notebooks but not as a reliable customer-facing experience.
    Approach
    Hardened prompts, added evals and guardrails, shipped a thin app layer with observability.
    Outcome
    Monitored LLM feature with CI regression checks and operator playbooks when the model fails.

How I work

A short path from first call to something your team can run — ceremony only where risk demands it.

  1. Discovery

    One focused session to lock the problem, constraints, and success checks — so I don’t build the wrong vertical.

  2. Prototype

    A thin slice with evals first — prove the approach before you fund a wide build.

  3. Harden

    Guardrails, observability, and ops paths — so on-call isn’t guessing when the model fails.

  4. Hand-off

    Docs, runbooks, and an optional retainer — your team owns the system after launch.

Engagements

Pick a starting shape — exact scope and price are set after discovery. No fabricated rate cards.

  • Discovery sprint

    Starting at ~1 week, fixed fee

    Problem framing, architecture options, success checks, and a written build plan with risks.

  • Build slice

    Starting at one fixed-scope milestone

    Ship one production vertical: RAG path, agent workflow, or LLM app surface — with hand-off docs.

  • Ongoing support

    Starting at a monthly hours-based retainer

    Evals, model updates, and iteration after launch — hours agreed up front, cancel anytime after the current month.

About

I’m Alan Redford Hayes — a freelance AI engineer focused on LLM apps, agents, and RAG. I ship systems operators can trust: clear failure modes, measurable quality, and hand-off that sticks. I don’t take chatbot skins with no evals, no ownership, or pressure for fabricated proof.

Get a fit check

Tell me what you’re shipping and what’s broken in prod today. I reply within 1 business day with a fit read, a rough timeline, and whether a discovery sprint is the right next step — no obligation.